This is a guest post by Dr Lesley McLean, Lecturer in Human Resource Management, Edinburgh Napier University.
The journey towards gaining a doctoral degree can be laborious, enlightening, frustrating, revelatory, tearful and joyful. It must also be transformative! Not just for the student putting in the hard yards, but also for the supervisors, reviewers and examiners alike. The relationship between a doctoral student and the many stakeholders in such a project is not merely transactional. It’s not just about the transfer of knowledge and experience. It is about change. It is a dynamic collaboration that significantly influences the trajectory of the student’s academic and professional growth. In this intricate web of mentorship, coaching, knowledge transfer and (hopefully) knowledge creation, three fundamental values stand out to me as pillars of truly effective doctoral supervision: communication, participation, and empathy.
Communication: The Cornerstone of Success
Clear and consistent communication is at the heart of any productive academic collaboration, and in the context of doctoral supervision, it is the cornerstone of success. A supervisor who excels in communication can create an environment of openness, transparency, and trust. Clarity in their expectations, student goals, and feedback is paramount, thus enabling the supervision team, alongside the student, to create a shared sense of direction which guides them on their research journey.
In the academic landscape, where ideas are currency, effective communication ensures that the intellectual exchange between supervisor and student is rich and meaningful. A supervisor skilled in communication articulates complex concepts with clarity, guiding the student through the labyrinth of academic inquiry, enabling the student to consider alternative perspectives. Timely and constructive feedback becomes a catalyst for improvement rather than a source of frustration and, in turn, resistance.
Furthermore, communication is a two-way street. A supervisor who actively listens to the concerns, ideas, and challenges of their students creates a collaborative atmosphere. This not only enhances the quality of research but also empowers students to take ownership of their projects, contributing to a more vibrant and engaged academic community.
Participation: Cultivating a Culture of Collaboration
Participation is not merely about being physically present; it is about actively engaging in the academic journey of the student. An effective Doctoral supervisor is more than an overseer; they are a collaborator, a guide, and a mentor. Actively participating in the scholarly pursuits of their students demonstrates a commitment to the shared goal of knowledge creation.
Participation takes various forms, from attending research seminars and conferences to contributing intellectually to the student’s work. This active involvement not only enhances the quality of the research but also inspires the student to strive for excellence. Knowing that their supervisor is invested in their success motivates students to push boundaries and explore new avenues of inquiry.
Moreover, participation extends beyond the academic realm. A supervisor who takes an interest in the personal and professional development of their students contributes to a holistic educational experience. This involvement creates a supportive community where students feel valued and empowered, nurturing a sense of academic belonging and acceptance that is crucial for long-term success.
Empathy: Nurturing the Human Element of Mentorship
In the realm of academia, where intellectual rigour often takes centre stage, the human element of mentorship is sometimes overlooked. Empathy, the ability to understand and share the feelings of another, is a fundamental quality that transforms a supervisor from a taskmaster to a mentor.
Doctoral candidates navigate a challenging and, at times, isolating journey. The pressures of research, publication, and the looming prospect of the dissertation and exam can be overwhelming. In such moments, a supervisor who embodies empathy becomes a crucial source of support. Understanding the unique challenges and pressures faced by each student allows the supervisor to tailor their guidance and support, fostering a sense of trust and mutual respect.
Empathy is essential in handling the inevitable setbacks and challenges that accompany academic research. Whether it’s a problematic experiment, a rejected paper, or personal struggles, an empathetic supervisor provides a safe space for students to navigate these difficulties. This emotional support not only contributes to the student’s well-being but also enhances their resilience and ability to overcome the obstacles that will inevitably face them on their academic journey.
Conclusion: Crafting Future Scholars through Holistic Mentorship
In the crucible of academia, effective doctoral supervision goes beyond the mere transmission of knowledge. It is about crafting future scholars, nurturing their intellectual curiosity, and instilling in them the values that define a successful academic career. Communication, participation, and empathy are not isolated virtues but interconnected threads that weave the fabric of a supportive and enriching mentorship.
As the perceived stewards of knowledge, doctoral supervisors wield immense influence in shaping the next generation of thinkers, researchers, and educators. By embracing and embodying the values of communication, participation, and empathy, supervisors not only contribute to the academic success of their students but also leave an enduring impact on the scholarly landscape.
How do you see communication, participation, and empathy playing out through your practice?
A community blog, on doctoral supervision relationships and pedagogies 